Luke Surl Comics

The latest from LukeSurl.com
‹
›
  • archive
  • About
  • Extras
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter2
I haven't got much further (not farther) since.
First Previous Random 57Comments Subscribe Next Latest
TIP: You can use the 'Z' (back) and 'C' (forward) keyboard buttons to navigate the comic archive.

004 - Love is in the air; the EPA have been notified.

by Luke on July 4, 2008 at 12:00 am

Discussion (57) ¬

[ Comments RSS ]
  1. Thomas
    September 19, 2008 at 6:59 am | # | Reply

    That looks like it could be on my dating application. :P

  2. Ryan G
    September 20, 2008 at 9:13 am | # | Reply

    Ah, so that’s why I didn’t get any replies.

  3. aimomo
    September 21, 2008 at 7:20 pm | # | Reply

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=less

  4. Jessica
    September 22, 2008 at 2:45 am | # | Reply

    This one is me. It’s why I can’t get a date. :P

  5. Milena
    September 22, 2008 at 9:36 pm | # | Reply

    Loved it.

  6. brad
    October 9, 2008 at 3:00 am | # | Reply

    Who uses a calligraphy marker on an application of any kind? If you must do that, at least take the time to practice your penmanship.

    I can’t imagine why there were no replies

  7. joeyknuccione
    October 16, 2008 at 1:24 am | # | Reply

    Who wants someone that’s gonna go around correcting you all the time?

  8. cloud9ine
    November 2, 2008 at 8:54 pm | # | Reply

    I think 50 words or less is fine, as is 50 or fewer words. The fewer applies to 50. And less applies to the quantity formed by ’50 words’

  9. aimono2
    November 11, 2008 at 8:52 pm | # | Reply

    aimono has it right. “Less” is perfectly acceptable and correct.

  10. John
    January 30, 2009 at 6:04 pm | # | Reply

    I was going to say exactly what Cloud9ine said, but he/she already said it!

  11. madoo
    March 9, 2009 at 11:32 am | # | Reply

    Less than 50 words, eh? So I guess you couldn’t just draw a picture.

  12. Luke
    March 14, 2009 at 12:07 am | # | Reply

    but a picture = 1000 words

  13. qw
    April 29, 2009 at 11:39 am | # | Reply

    but isn’t it “interchangEable”?

  14. Chris Shendo
    June 29, 2009 at 1:33 am | # | Reply

    haha. FAIL! Less works fine.

  15. Joe
    July 3, 2009 at 2:18 am | # | Reply

    I have less money than you. Money is most definitely countable. And I do not have “fewer” money than you.

  16. charlie
    July 12, 2009 at 9:13 pm | # | Reply

    Money is an abstract noun, so in itself it is not countable; you cannot have ‘monnies’.

    • Gristofer
      August 20, 2009 at 5:54 am | # | Reply

      Moneys or Monies, is acceptable, it seems. I think a good example would be talking about different forms of currency — or bartering material — being used to together and lumping them under the term moneys.

      I guess since money is so often used as an abstract, like water, it’s odd to think of it in terms of referring to unique items.

      • Gristofer
        August 20, 2009 at 5:55 am | #

        cite: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/money

      • infotech
        August 20, 2009 at 6:51 am | #

        Actually, “moneys” is a word… see http://www.moneys.com

  17. korgo
    August 19, 2009 at 6:41 pm | # | Reply

    lol, dating agencies with paper… what is this the 90′s?

  18. Thomas Mortley
    August 19, 2009 at 6:49 pm | # | Reply

    If it happened to be a girl who wrote this quite exquisite paragraph, I would marry her.

  19. Chris
    August 19, 2009 at 6:55 pm | # | Reply

    That looks like it was written with Adobe Flash. But I hope it wasn’t…

    • John
      August 20, 2009 at 4:16 pm | # | Reply

      Considering this is a comic site I’m guessing it’s not supposed to be real :-) .

  20. Travis Ballard
    August 19, 2009 at 7:10 pm | # | Reply

    how exactly does this look like it was written in adobe flash? there’s no animation. no tweening. it also isn’t even a flash document (swf). to me it looks as if it were written on paper, with a fountain pen. but for the sake of the intarnets, it was ‘shopped’. probably not, but then again who really cares. toodles.

    • Luke
      Luke
      August 19, 2009 at 7:27 pm | # | Reply

      I used a very special pen

    • Chris
      August 20, 2009 at 10:27 am | # | Reply

      I’m not talking about an animation. Have you used Flash before? It has a very nice calligraphy style brush that makes strokes just like that. That and the reason that the black dots are easily seen underneath the writing (opacity…) makes it seem possible. I’m not trying to poke holes in this or anything; I’m just suggesting the possibility… for the sake of the intrawebs. But it was probably just a nice pen.

      • Luke
        Luke
        August 20, 2009 at 10:51 am | #

        I drew this with a graphics tablet and Adobe Photoshop elements 3.0 if I remember correctly (no paper was harmed in the making of this comic). Flash is unfortionately very expensive, and you can do layering and stuff on Photoshop quite well.
        Thanks for your comments!
        L

      • Chris
        August 20, 2009 at 6:27 pm | #

        Believe me, I can’t either afford Flash… *wink

  21. Wondertrash
    August 19, 2009 at 7:15 pm | # | Reply

    50 words or less? Ok, “less” Am I taking you too literally?

  22. someguy
    August 19, 2009 at 7:16 pm | # | Reply

    Ummm. It’s not necessarily incorrect by the way. The last part of the sentence was intentionally left out (“or less [...]“), yet this comment assumes it would have ended with “or less words”. In THAT case, yes, it would have been incorrect, but it could just as well have ended “or less than that”.

    So it’s actually not necessarily a mistake!

    • Anonymous
      Anonymous
      August 20, 2009 at 5:05 pm | # | Reply

      As a language aficionado (or grammar Nazi as some people would say), I agree. The correct way to use “fewer” here would be to say “Describe yourself in 50 or fewer words”. “Describe yourself in 50 words or fewer” is less correct (or at least feels less correct/ more stilted) than “Describe yourself in 50 words or less”, because “less than that” is definitely implied here. It’s not quite the same situation as “12 items or less” in express checkout lanes because there it’s all about the exact number of items, but here it’s about how detailed the description should be.

      • Richard
        August 21, 2009 at 12:21 am | #

        actually, the way the question (well, order) is phrased it doesn’t imply “or less than that”. It implies “less words” (on the principle that you want to imply as little as possible). And “less words” is absolutely, demonstrably, incorrect.

  23. Anonymous
    Anonymous
    August 19, 2009 at 7:28 pm | # | Reply

    Well, the guy is using a calligraphy pen.
    So, y’know, doesn’t have much room to criticize a grammatical error.

  24. beargulch
    August 19, 2009 at 7:36 pm | # | Reply

    You’d think that someone who cares so much about the grammatical difference between “less” and “fewer” would know how to spell “interchangEable”

  25. bob
    August 20, 2009 at 11:16 am | # | Reply

    actually i think the term is “monies” like having the benjamins
    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/monies

  26. ConcretelyAmbiguous
    August 20, 2009 at 1:46 pm | # | Reply

    So if that’s the case, I guess P. Diddy must have truly been “all about the monies” back in the day. Maybe/Maybe Not.

  27. alforst08
    August 20, 2009 at 4:53 pm | # | Reply

    well after reading all the comments left before me I just have one thing left to say…
    I think this is hillarious…

  28. Igor
    Igor
    August 24, 2009 at 6:01 pm | # | Reply

    it’s interchangeable not interchangable.

  29. Anonymous
    Anonymous
    August 25, 2009 at 12:03 am | # | Reply

    he’s correct

  30. Luke
    Luke
    August 25, 2009 at 12:11 am | # | Reply

    The misspelling, though unintentional, will not be corrected. Maybe it kinda adds an extra layer to the joke?

  31. Rumait
    August 25, 2009 at 5:23 am | # | Reply

    may be he …………

  32. Hannah
    August 27, 2009 at 10:18 am | # | Reply

    Gee.. Is the person who filled the form a teacher?

  33. Bellefast
    September 6, 2009 at 7:50 am | # | Reply

    I would totally date them - it pisses me off that people use ‘less’ in that way!

  34. Rep
    September 7, 2009 at 8:28 am | # | Reply

    oh yea appropriate literary applications doesn’t even matter what sex it is these two will have a go

  35. softgeek
    September 7, 2009 at 10:59 pm | # | Reply

    I agree with him. It is one of my pet peeves.

  36. Uhh
    February 14, 2010 at 3:14 am | # | Reply

    Try not being such a ****ing grammar nazi if you don’t know how to spell, yourself.

    • Luke
      Luke
      February 14, 2010 at 8:43 am | # | Reply

      1) This is not real. It’s a COMIC. The grammar Nazi thing is part of the JOKE.
      2) Your comma between “spell” and “yourself” is completely unnecessary. :)

      • poydflink
        March 4, 2010 at 2:56 am | #

        you’re awesome.

  37. Miel
    February 18, 2010 at 1:19 pm | # | Reply

    Thumbs up for Luke. :)

  38. Z
    March 9, 2010 at 2:32 am | # | Reply

    Bonus bad pun:
    So everyone at the dating agency had to use lighters instead of matches.

    Yes, I’m truly sorry for that one.

  39. Jim
    March 12, 2010 at 3:06 pm | # | Reply

    I’d date the guy, too.

  40. tuco
    March 19, 2010 at 4:23 am | # | Reply

    But he DID tell us alot about himself

  41. Sarah
    July 13, 2010 at 2:48 pm | # | Reply

    @uhh
    “Try not being such a ****ing grammar nazi if you don’t know how to spell, yourself.”

    I know how to spell yourself, so can I be the grammar nazi?

Pings & Trackbacks ¬

    • popurls.com // popular today
      August 19, 2009 at 7:00 pm | #
    • Casual Friday | Grapefrugten.dk
      August 21, 2009 at 11:32 am | #
    • Tech Thoughts Daily Net News - August 23, 2009 « Bill Mullins’ Weblog - Tech Thoughts
      August 23, 2009 at 4:40 pm | #
    • Braindump 31/08/09 « Gareth’s Blog
      August 31, 2009 at 5:56 pm | #

Comment ¬
Cancel reply

@lukesurl on Twitter

    Luke Surl
    Norwich, UK
  • Never bring ten-thousand spoons to a knife fight.
    2012/07/15
  • #didyouknow The Higgs field is responsible for just 2% of the mass of ordinary matter, and only 0.02% of the mass of yo momma.
    2012/07/15
  • Wish that couple would just GET A ROOM, convert it into OFFICE SPACE, start a successful PUBLISHING BUSINESS and aid the local ECONOMY
    2012/07/15
  • Hard to concentrate when the person in the next office is playing mini-golf so badly. It's really off-putting.
    2012/07/15
  • FYI you should get The Whole Story collection. It would be a most wise choice of action.
    http://t.co/K4CqCvG7
    2012/07/15

Most Shared Comics

  • 380 - Picking up the pieces
  • 187 – An unequal relationship?
  • 280 – Calvinism (but no Hobbes)
  • 366 – Baby got back
  • 317 – Blessed are the pawn in spirit

Comics by email:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Tag cloud

Pirates Economy Superheroes murder Cavemen Vampires Nursery Rhymes Superman Poetry Internet Space Pop Music Video Games Science Ocean Medical sea Rock Wizard of Oz Math Evolution Love Zombies Shakespeare Maths Literature physics Fish Graphs philosophy Religion songs Chess Art Musicals Grammar Magic money Psychiatrist Christmas music Facebook Death crime Mathematics Animals Politics chemistry CCTV Court Film Health narcissism Heart star trek Drugs Hamlet Computers Police Mythology

©2008-2012 Luke Surl | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑