Definitely the 14th material fallacy (to be included in De sophisiticis elenchis Aristotulum. BTW, somebody got his mobile number?)…
Is it bad that I don’t quite get the joke?
Only if you know what an ad hominem is, and still don’t get it.
The title text is clearly an ad matrem fallacy.
luke this is completely incomprehensible
@ Mr GBH and Clem: um… ad hominem means attacking the person (instead of their argument). So… that’s the joke.
I know… don’t explain the joke. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitle0t9r68ih?from=Main.DontExplainTheJoke
Now I get it……. And I did indeed laugh this time.
AJ, evil man, now I will be wasting another 14 hours on TVTropes… Oooh, lampshade hanging, I wonder what that is!
wouldn’t it make more sense if it was tu quoque instead of ad hominem?
NAME
EMAIL — optional, will not be published
WEBSITE
Definitely the 14th material fallacy (to be included in De sophisiticis elenchis Aristotulum. BTW, somebody got his mobile number?)…
Is it bad that I don’t quite get the joke?
Only if you know what an ad hominem is, and still don’t get it.
The title text is clearly an ad matrem fallacy.
luke this is completely incomprehensible
@ Mr GBH and Clem: um… ad hominem means attacking the person (instead of their argument). So… that’s the joke.
I know… don’t explain the joke. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Ptitle0t9r68ih?from=Main.DontExplainTheJoke
Now I get it……. And I did indeed laugh this time.
AJ, evil man, now I will be wasting another 14 hours on TVTropes… Oooh, lampshade hanging, I wonder what that is!
wouldn’t it make more sense if it was tu quoque instead of ad hominem?